|
_SLIDE_1_
Comparative analysis of welfare policies from 3 parties
_SLIDE_2_
Table of Contents
Free nuturing, expanding facilities
1
Infant care
Tuition
2
State scholarship, Tuition cap, Half-price-tuituion
Conclusion
‘Welfare’, Role of state
4
Free & universal welfare , Selective welfare
3
Medical care
_SLIDE_3_
Perspectives of recognizing the problem
Although they have different ideologies, having similar policies
새누리당
- larger proportion of welfare, Universal welfare
- accepted childcare welfare in terms of labor force expansion related to producing population (national competitiveness)
민주통합당
- Universal welfare
- excessive child nurturing expenses
→ dropped birth rate because of economic problems
통합진보당
- Universal welfare
Looking at childcare welfare in terms of economic class
Childcare condition is getting worse because of social polarization
_SLIDE_4_
Goal & Public pledges
새누…(생략)
|
care and child education facilities
: excessively depending on private center, lack of facilities
: expand facilities by 30%
_SLIDE_7_
Summary (Infant care)
새누리당
민주통합당
통합진보당
Recognition of problem
Dropped birth rate
→ increase future labor
Too much nurturing expense
→ dropped birth rate
사회 양극화
→ bad nurture environment
goal
Reinforce the government’s role
Tighten up the government’s role
Increase the government’s role
이행 및 절차
기간
After making programs
(from 2013)
After amending 영,유아법 및 아동복지법
(from 2013)
After a demand investigation
(immediately)
Way to procure budget
Increasing tax payer
Saving tax spending
Fiscal reform
Welfare reform
Tax reform
Increasing tax
Matching federal money and state money
Required budget
27조 4,815억원
추산불가
(임의추정 29조 1616억원)
25조 7516억원 +
Main pledges
Providing nurturing money
Vaccination system
Working mom
-Build childcare center and childcare service management system
-Expand public childcare and child educa
Comparative analysis of welfare policies from 3 pa~.pptx
[Size :
1 Mbyte
]
장바구니
